|
About the Council
About
the Region
Program
Areas
Current
Projects
Publications
Newsletter
Events
/ What's New
Links
Contact
Us
Directions
Home
|
National
Models of Municipal Best Practices in other Regions
The
following list of metropolitan and regional planning initiatives addresses
problems similar to those in the Genesee/Finger Lakes Region. Many cities,
counties, and regions across the nation are trying to find best practices
that help to use land more efficiently, preserve farmland and open space,
and minimize perils to public health and private property. As with New
York State, other
states assist local governments and citizens in their search
for more livable communities.
The
selected examples represent cities that are as populous or more populous
than the City of Rochester and regions that cover a larger land area than
the Genesee/Finger Lakes Region. To review planning initiatives of bigger
cities or regions can help us to find the tools to address both current
problems and future challenges.
-
The
Pittsburgh
Area New Direction Alternative (PANDA) is a non-profit
volunteer effort to encourage concerned citizens of all political
parties to run for office and to hold elected officials accountable.
Used as a public policy platform in past municipal elections, PANDA
addresses such issues as land use, the local economy, education,
transportation, transit, community revitalization, and historic
preservation.
-
The
Smart
Growth Initiative is the City of Austin’s plan to
preserve and enhance the livability of the community. As an official
document it deals with such aspects of planning as land use,
transportation, transit, downtown revitalization. Among others, the
initiative recommends best practices such as open space preservation,
infill development, Transit-Oriented Development, Traditional
Neighborhood Development, and smart growth zones.
-
Smart
Growth Twin Cities is an initiative that encourages
residents of Minneapolis-St. Paul to assist in local and regional
planning. This initiative focuses primarily on neighborhood
revitalization and transit-related issues.
-
Metro
provides a regional forum for the Portland, Oregon, region where
cities, counties, and citizens can resolve issues related to growth.
As a directly elected regional government body, Metro addresses
planning related aspects such as land-use and transportation choices
and stream and open space protection.
-
The
Atlanta
Regional Commission is the planning agency for the
10-county Atlanta region. In its 2000 report the Commission discusses
the consequences of the projected further growth of the region in
terms of land use, transportation, air and water quality.
-
The
San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) is the forum for
regional decision-making. The Association has released Region2020,
a growth management strategy for the San Diego region. The strategy
addresses such issues as land use, economy, transportation,
environment, housing, and fiscal reform.
-
The
Lake
Tahoe Regional Planning Agency as a bi-state regional
planning agency is primarily concerned with development impacts on the
environment. In 1987 it could hammer out a regional agreement that
regulates, among other things, land use, density, rate of growth, land
coverage, and excavation. The legally binding Code is designed to
bring the region into conformance with established environmental
standards.
-
The
Chesapeake
2000 Bay Agreement is an agreement signed by three states,
the Bay commission, and the EPA to protect and restore the Bay’s
ecosystem. To accomplish this goal, the Agreement lists, among other
things, sound land-use and transportation practices.
-
The
New
York City’s Water Supply System Watershed Agreement was
signed by New York City, New York State, the EPA, and the seven
watershed counties to protect those watersheds that provide New York
City and adjacent counties with drinking water. This legal document
regulates, among other things, sewage and stormwater systems,
agricultural activities, and solid waste management.
When
we compare the proposed best practices for the Genesee/Finger Lakes Region
to those of the nine national models it is evident that most metropolitan
areas and regions have adopted similar practices that will help to improve
land-use efficiency. Some of them, however, also include additional
elements such as air and water quality, transportation, housing, and other
issues that are vital to regional health. The first six national models
are general guidelines for regional cooperation, whereas the last three
models are more strategically oriented initiatives that are legally
binding throughout the designated regions.
An
important element in implementing regional best practices is
intergovernmental cooperation. A good example for regional cooperation is
the Lake Tahoe Regional Planning Agency’s Code. The Code regulates
regional development because permitted and special use restriction and
dimensional requirements are uniform throughout the entire region.
But
municipalities across the nation differ significantly in the extent to
which they can exercise home-rule power. This is particularly true for New
York State with its strong home-rule tradition, in contrast to such states
as Maryland or Nevada. However, for example, as the New York City’s
Water Supply System Watershed Agreement demonstrates, cooperation across
municipal boundaries and on the regional level is feasible in New York
State. The Agreement became possible because stakeholders from different
parts of the region realized that the watershed protection plan is
financially more advantageous for all the municipalities involved than the
more costly filtration plan. A shared financial interest led to the
Agreement that in turn will protect water resources and natural habitat
through region-wide uniform land-use practices.
Go
To Next Section
|